Français
Today, containerd is among the most reliable open‑source software solutions for managing containers in modern environments. This open‑source project handles the full container lifecycle, from image pulling to execution and supervision, making it an essential component for cloud‑native platforms and distributed architectures. In this review, we will explore its features, use cases, compare it to alternatives, and assess whether it deserves production adoption.
Problems solved
Why containerd is useful
Many “turn‑key” container solutions are heavyweight, complex, or introduce unnecessary layers.
Commercial tools or proprietary distributions can impose license, portability, or compatibility constraints.
Modern orchestration systems (cloud, micro‑services, clusters, DevOps) need a simple, robust runtime that conforms to standards and can be easily integrated into automation pipelines.
containerd meets these expectations by providing an open‑source, standardized, universal solution that reliably manages the container lifecycle without superfluous layers, while remaining compliant with industry specifications—making it an excellent choice to replace proprietary or more complex solutions.
Key features and capabilities
Below are the primary capabilities of containerd:
Full container lifecycle management: image pull and push, storage, unpacking, creation, start, supervision, and deletion.
Support for standard specifications: compliance with OCI standards (OCI Image Spec and OCI Runtime Spec via runC), ensuring compatibility and portability.
Fine‑grained filesystem and snapshot handling: uses overlayfs or btrfs for image and container filesystem storage, enabling efficient disk usage.
Network and isolation support: attaches network interfaces, manages namespaces, provides multi‑tenant handling, facilitating production or multi‑user deployments.
Integration with modern orchestrators: through its CRI plugin, containerd can serve as the runtime for Kubernetes clusters. This plugin is built‑in since version 1.1 and benefits from continuous contributions by an active open‑source community.
Lightness and portability: designed as a simple daemon, usable on both Linux and Windows, with minimal kernel/OS requirements.
Installation and configuration
The major steps to install and configure containerd are:
Install containerd from your distribution’s official packages (e.g., via a Linux package manager) or download the official release from the project website.
Verify system prerequisites: on Linux, a relatively recent kernel (often 4.x or newer) is recommended if you plan to use overlayfs.
Configure (if needed) the configuration file (default
/etc/containerd/config.toml) to adjust the snapshotter, cgroup manager, network or storage plugins according to your use case.(Optional) Install auxiliary tools for management (e.g., shell completion scripts, debugging utilities) to ease command‑line usage.
In an orchestrated context (e.g., Kubernetes), ensure that containerd is correctly set as the runtime via its CRI plugin, allowing the orchestrator to control containers through containerd.
Use cases
Concrete examples of containerd in professional environments:
Deploying micro‑services on servers or Kubernetes clusters, guaranteeing isolation, image portability, and reliable container lifecycle management.
Cloud‑native or hybrid infrastructures where containerd replaces Docker as the primary runtime, offering a lighter, more standard‑compliant runtime that integrates smoothly into CI/CD pipelines.
Multi‑tenant or shared‑hosting environments where containerd’s network namespaces and storage isolation let different users’ containers coexist while sharing resources.
Developing containerized applications that need portability, orchestration, and automation without reliance on closed or proprietary solutions.
Comparison with alternatives
| Feature / Criteria | containerd | Docker Engine classique | CRI-O |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open source | ✅ | ✅ (open source but can add proprietary layers) | ✅ |
| OCI & standard runtime compliance | ✅ | ✅ (via containerd backend) | ✅ |
| Lightness and minimalism | ✅ | ❌ often heavier with extra features | ✅ (minimal, CRI‑focused) |
| Native Kubernetes integration | ✅ (via plugin CRI) | ❌ requires an extra layer, less optimized | ✅ (designed for Kubernetes) |
| Flexibility of storage / snapshot / namespace | ✅ | ✅ but often Docker‑specific configs | ✅ (sometimes less mature than containerd) |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| ✅ Open‑source solution, no restrictive license | ❌ Configuration and management are more “raw” than packaged solutions |
| ✅ Lightweight, minimalist, standardized runtime | ❌ Fewer user‑level abstractions; basic CLI interface |
| ✅ Excellent Kubernetes compatibility, cloud‑native, micro‑services ready | ❌ Requires technical knowledge to configure and operate correctly |
| ✅ Fine‑grained container lifecycle management with an active open‑source community that can provide technical support | ❌ Active community but less “mainstream” than Docker (fewer turnkey tutorials) |
Conclusion
containerd is a mature, robust, and standardized container runtime, perfectly suited for cloud‑native environments, cluster deployments, and modern container‑based architectures. As an open‑source project, it offers a reliable and flexible foundation for developers, system administrators, and IT specialists comfortable with configuring and operating infrastructure. Lighter and more standard than legacy or proprietary solutions, it is a compelling choice for those seeking a future‑proof, modular, and open approach to containers. containerd is clearly worth evaluating.
